The narration

My persuasive argument thesis is : Censorship is not necessary on the internet.

1. What do people already know about my topic?
Everyone knows that censorship is always around our living. Recently, through '세월호사건', Korean often recognize government's censorship on the media. Korean government misreported outline of the issue and disappeared and losses. Media act as citizens are fool and soon citizens are mad for that. As the result of media censorship, citizens didn't trust the issue of '유병언 사건' - 유병언 is a person related to '세월호 사건' and has reponsibility of the issue. In addition, '유병언 사건' is that media and government reported the hot issued person, 유병언 is dead. However, citizens didn't believe that. - So, recent citizens, especially netizens are considering whether censorship on the media, especially on the internet is necessary or not.

2. What research has already been done about my topic?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship 
Based on this souce, I made own definition of censorship and I could know more information about censorship and specific examples of each countries' status of cencorship.
http://chineseculture.about.com/od/mediainchina/a/Internet-Censorship-in-China.htm
http://chineseculture.about.com/od/businesseconomy/a/China-Internet-Sector-What-You-Need-To-Know.htm
http://www.hrichina.org/en/content/3244
Internet censorship in China is very oppressive and China should control their oppressive internet censorship for Chinese netizens.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/disadvantages-internet-censorship-28293.html
Status after internet censorship is enforced.

3. What are the implications of my argument?
If people ignore me, we can't get out of the censorship. We won't enjoy our right to enjoy free on the internet and government use their power of censorship to discover lots of facts related to the government. It will make people just fool on the internet.

My Narration
Through the experience of issues which are '세월호 사건' and '유병언 사건', especially Korean could recognize riskiness of censorship on the internet. As the result, people trying to recognize and decide whether the censorship is necessary on the internet. 

Internet censorship in China is very opperssive, so it's most popular example of internet censorship. From China's internet censorship, not only Korean but also people all around the world already knew the riskiness of the internet censorship. Then, we have to know that internet censorship makes another side effect and also makes people fool. Streisand effect is one of that and if people ignore the riskiness of internet censorship, they won't enjoy their freedom anymore.

In addition, we have to be conative against internet censorship around us. Therefore, from now on I will explain reasons why internet censorship is not necessary.