Conclusion

Conclusion
Most people, especially netizens are seem sensetive to lots of issues as '세월호 사건' and '유병언 사건'. However, that's only when the issues are major and become popular. This pattern is common life around netizens, but they have to be sensitive to this pattern. Netizens have to recognize basic purpose of internet censorship and netizen's duty of deciding actively about issues. Also they should recognize internet censorship ruins 'netizen's right to know' and 'netizen's freedom'.

 Those who disagree with my argument can refute as recent netizens don't need more freedom and they are ensured their basic rights. However, those are the results of adaption in internet censorship. Most netizens feel riskness of hard and over internet censorship only when the major issues happen. However, netizens have to sensitive on their recent situation. In the middle of information revolution, it's weird and contradictory that netizens still in the limits of their right to know and to be free.

Netizens have their duty and ability to decide lots of sources' reliability and harmness. If censorship continue on the internet as now, it only makes netizens fool. Before expriencing the side effect as 'Streisand effect', netizen have to recognize that they have to get out of censorship on the internet themselves.