Classical argument outline

1. The introduction
I will start by describing the situation everyone is already familiar with :
Government's censorship on the media is becoming more and more tight. Even the censorship is enfored on the internet. Like Korea's '세월호 사건', there are lots of countries enforcing internet censorship.
As asking 'what do you think about these status of internet censorship?' and I will end with my thesis, "Internet censorship is not necessary."

2. The narration
I will summarize the research I've done and provide a definition of internet censorship and specific examples of countries which enforcing internet censorship especially China. In addition, I will explain the effects of enforcing internet censorship.

3. The confirmation
I will start by mentioning the problem of internet censorship as it disturbs internet freedom and I will provide my researches about internet freedom. Then, I will mention the right to know with my researches that shows the examples that disturb netizens' right to know. Finally, I will mention that deciding whether the internet information is harmful or not is up to netizens' own judge, not up to government.

4. The refutation and concession
I will concede that there are lots of harmful information and internet censorship is for protecting those. However, as I mentioned above(number3), I will refut as deciding those is just up to netizens and making ideal internet society is netizens' duty as providing my research about an example, netizens' duty.

5. The summation
I will close with a summary of my previous points and make an aftereffect that makes readers think about whether internet censorship is necessary or not. In the end, I will mention my thesis again.